Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AIRR vs SPHQ: how they differ

Over the year SPHQ returned more, +17.4% against +15.0%, and SPHQ charges 0.15% against 0.69%.

First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AIRR and SPHQ hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AIRR and SPHQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAIRRSPHQ
EMCOR GROUP INC3.75%0.47%
CH ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC4.08%0.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AIRROnly in SPHQ
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 6.00%Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%
ARGAN INC 4.73%Visa Inc. 4.69%
COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC 4.42%Apple Inc. 4.51%
MASTEC INC 4.18%Mastercard Inc. 4.32%
OWENS CORNING 3.90%General Electric Co. 4.16%
DYCOM INDUSTRIES INC 3.76%Lam Research Corp. 4.10%
SAIA INC 3.54%Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.97%Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

AIRR and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustInvesco
What it isReshoring and manufacturingS&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year+15.0%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.5 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.69%0.15%
Already in the S&P 5005.5%99.9%
Holdings5899

AIRR in plain words

By weight, 6% of AIRR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 30% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.5 pts. It sits 19.5% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AIRR or SPHQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AIRR returned +15.0% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AIRR or SPHQ?
AIRR charges 0.69% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AIRR and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 6% of AIRR and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are AIRR and SPHQ the same kind of fund?
No. AIRR is a thematic ETF and SPHQ is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AIRR against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIRR against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AIRR-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources