Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHQ vs VYM: how they differ

SPHQ and VYM hold 16% of their weight in the same names.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and VYM hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHQ and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHQVYM
Caterpillar Inc.3.78%1.73%
Cisco Systems, Inc.3.54%1.52%
Procter & Gamble Co. (The)3.46%1.45%
Coca-Cola Co. (The)3.34%1.28%
Merck & Co., Inc.2.87%1.14%
QUALCOMM Inc.2.03%0.80%
Eaton Corp. PLC1.65%0.71%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.2.28%0.68%
Newmont Corp.1.22%0.51%
Progressive Corp. (The)1.41%0.49%
Accenture PLC1.04%0.46%
Johnson Controls International PLC1.05%0.37%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHQOnly in VYM
Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%Broadcom Inc 8.07%
Visa Inc. 4.69%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
Apple Inc. 4.51%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Mastercard Inc. 4.32%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
General Electric Co. 4.16%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
Lam Research Corp. 4.10%Chevron Corp 1.51%
KLA Corp. 3.27%Bank of America Corp 1.45%
GE Vernova Inc. 3.15%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

SPHQ and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isS&P 500 QualityUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50099.9%92.2%
Holdings99608

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHQ or VYM?
SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHQ and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHQ against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources