Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHQ vs VHT: how they differ

SPHQ and VHT hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and VHT hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHQ and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHQVHT
Merck & Co., Inc.2.87%4.67%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.2.28%2.64%
Cencora, Inc.0.66%0.79%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.0.61%0.71%
Zoetis Inc.0.66%0.54%
ResMed Inc.0.32%0.44%
Steris PLC0.25%0.33%
Incyte Corp.0.21%0.26%
Waters Corp.0.19%0.60%
Solventum Corp.0.13%0.18%
Revvity, Inc.0.11%0.19%
Bio-Techne Corp.0.09%0.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHQOnly in VHT
Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%Eli Lilly & Co 14.07%
Visa Inc. 4.69%Johnson & Johnson 8.48%
Apple Inc. 4.51%AbbVie Inc 6.10%
Mastercard Inc. 4.32%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.46%
General Electric Co. 4.16%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 2.93%
Lam Research Corp. 4.10%Amgen Inc 2.87%
Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%Intuitive Surgical Inc 2.39%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54%Abbott Laboratories 2.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SPHQ and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isS&P 500 QualityHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50099.9%85.6%
Holdings99401

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHQ or VHT?
SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHQ and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHQ against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources