Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs XLF: how they differ

SDY and XLF hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and SDY returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and XLF hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYXLF
Aflac Inc0.94%0.71%
Travelers Cos Inc/The0.69%0.93%
Ameriprise Financial Inc0.60%0.54%
Chubb Ltd0.51%1.62%
Cincinnati Financial Corp1.11%0.38%
S&P Global Inc0.35%1.63%
T Rowe Price Group Inc1.09%0.32%
Brown & Brown Inc0.39%0.25%
W R Berkley Corp0.24%0.27%
Globe Life Inc0.47%0.18%
Assurant Inc0.62%0.18%
Franklin Resources Inc0.43%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in XLF
Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10%
Realty Income Corp 2.14%JPMorgan Chase & Co 11.57%
Kenvue Inc 1.76%Visa Inc 7.51%
Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%Mastercard Inc 5.47%
AbbVie Inc 1.63%Bank of America Corp 4.91%
QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 3.94%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%Wells Fargo & Co 3.34%
Target Corp 1.55%Morgan Stanley 3.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SDY and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR S&P DividendFinancials
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%100.0%
Holdings15576

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and XLF returned +7.6%, so SDY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or XLF?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources