Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs VYM: how they differ

SDY and VYM hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and VYM hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYVYM
AbbVie Inc1.63%1.57%
Chevron Corp1.28%1.51%
Coca-Cola Co/The1.26%1.28%
Procter & Gamble Co/The1.26%1.45%
Texas Instruments Inc1.56%1.07%
Johnson & Johnson1.00%2.31%
Exxon Mobil Corp0.93%2.73%
PepsiCo Inc1.33%0.91%
International Business Machines Corp1.27%0.90%
McDonald's Corp0.89%0.88%
NextEra Energy Inc1.08%0.85%
Verizon Communications Inc2.15%0.85%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in VYM
Realty Income Corp 2.14%Broadcom Inc 8.07%
Medtronic PLC 1.30%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
Amcor PLC 0.93%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
Accenture PLC 0.88%Bank of America Corp 1.45%
Essex Property Trust Inc 0.87%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.41%
CSX Corp 0.62%Home Depot Inc/The 1.37%
RB Global Inc 0.60%Oracle Corp 1.14%
Equity LifeStyle Properties Inc 0.58%Merck & Co Inc 1.14%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

SDY and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR S&P DividendUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%92.2%
Holdings155608

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or VYM?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources