Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs SPY: how they differ

SDY and SPY hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and SPY returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and SPY hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and SPY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYSPY
Johnson & Johnson1.00%0.95%
Exxon Mobil Corp0.93%0.88%
AbbVie Inc1.63%0.69%
Procter & Gamble Co/The1.26%0.53%
Coca-Cola Co/The1.26%0.49%
Chevron Corp1.28%0.48%
Caterpillar Inc0.47%0.76%
Texas Instruments Inc1.56%0.42%
International Business Machines Corp1.27%0.41%
Microsoft Corp0.36%4.30%
QUALCOMM Inc1.57%0.30%
Analog Devices Inc0.61%0.30%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in SPY
Medtronic PLC 1.30%NVIDIA Corp. 7.52%
Amcor PLC 0.93%Apple, Inc. 6.59%
Accenture PLC 0.88%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62%
RPM International Inc 0.64%Alphabet, Inc. 3.25%
RB Global Inc 0.60%Broadcom, Inc. 2.77%
Equity LifeStyle Properties Inc 0.58%Alphabet, Inc. 2.59%
Linde PLC 0.56%Micron Technology, Inc. 2.02%
Carlisle Cos Inc 0.56%Meta Platforms, Inc. 1.92%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SDY and SPY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR S&P DividendS&P 500, book from IVV
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+17.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%100.0%
Holdings155504

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPY in plain words

SPY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or SPY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and SPY returned +17.5%, so SPY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or SPY?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and SPY charges 0.09%, so SPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and SPY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 100% of SPY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against SPY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against SPY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-SPY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources