Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AGG vs SPY

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

AGG and SPY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isUS aggregate bondsS&P 500, book from IVV
Total return, 1 year+1.3%+20.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−18.6 pts+0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.03%not published
Holdingsn/a504

AGG in plain words

AGG is a bond fund tracking US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

SPY in plain words

SPY is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500, book from IVV. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or SPY?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned +1.3% and SPY returned +20.0%, so SPY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AGG against SPY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against SPY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AGG-SPY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources