Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SDY vs SPMO: how they differ
SDY and SPMO hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SDY and SPMO hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SDY | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 1.26% | 1.21% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 1.00% | 3.85% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 0.93% | 2.78% |
| Analog Devices Inc | 0.61% | 0.81% |
| Cummins Inc | 0.69% | 0.51% |
| Lockheed Martin Corp | 0.85% | 0.49% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.47% | 2.60% |
| General Dynamics Corp | 0.84% | 0.45% |
| L3Harris Technologies Inc | 0.52% | 0.42% |
| Northrop Grumman Corp | 0.47% | 0.35% |
| Cardinal Health Inc | 0.47% | 0.33% |
| Cencora Inc | 0.29% | 0.28% |
| Only in SDY | Only in SPMO |
|---|---|
| Verizon Communications Inc 2.15% | Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72% |
| Realty Income Corp 2.14% | NVIDIA Corp. 8.46% |
| Kenvue Inc 1.76% | Broadcom Inc. 7.58% |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75% | Alphabet Inc. 4.81% |
| AbbVie Inc 1.63% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14% |
| QUALCOMM Inc 1.57% | Alphabet Inc. 3.81% |
| Texas Instruments Inc 1.56% | Lam Research Corp. 3.54% |
| Target Corp 1.55% | Intel Corp. 2.95% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SDY State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF | SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | Invesco |
| What it is | SPDR S&P Dividend | S&P 500 Momentum |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.0% | +24.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.5 pts | +7.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.13% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 84.6% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 155 | 99 |
SDY in plain words
SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SDY or SPMO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SDY or SPMO?
- SDY charges 0.35% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SDY and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources