Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SDY vs SPHQ: how they differ
SDY and SPHQ hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SDY and SPHQ hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SDY | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc | 1.57% | 2.03% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 1.26% | 3.34% |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The | 1.26% | 3.46% |
| Illinois Tool Works Inc | 1.03% | 0.94% |
| Colgate-Palmolive Co | 1.16% | 0.71% |
| Ameriprise Financial Inc | 0.60% | 0.61% |
| Fastenal Co | 0.91% | 0.53% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.47% | 3.78% |
| Cintas Corp | 0.43% | 0.62% |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp | 1.75% | 0.40% |
| WW Grainger Inc | 0.40% | 0.55% |
| Kenvue Inc | 1.76% | 0.32% |
| Only in SDY | Only in SPHQ |
|---|---|
| Verizon Communications Inc 2.15% | Visa Inc. 4.69% |
| Realty Income Corp 2.14% | Apple Inc. 4.51% |
| AbbVie Inc 1.63% | Mastercard Inc. 4.32% |
| Texas Instruments Inc 1.56% | General Electric Co. 4.16% |
| Target Corp 1.55% | Lam Research Corp. 4.10% |
| Automatic Data Processing Inc 1.54% | Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54% |
| Edison International 1.45% | KLA Corp. 3.27% |
| Sysco Corp 1.41% | GE Vernova Inc. 3.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| SDY State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF | SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | Invesco |
| What it is | SPDR S&P Dividend | S&P 500 Quality |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.0% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.5 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 84.6% | 99.9% |
| Holdings | 155 | 99 |
SDY in plain words
SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPHQ in plain words
SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SDY or SPHQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SDY or SPHQ?
- SDY charges 0.35% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SDY and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources