Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHH vs SPHD: how they differ

SCHH and SPHD hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and SCHH returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. REIT ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHH and SPHD hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHH and SPHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHHSPHD
Realty Income Corp4.00%2.43%
Crown Castle Inc2.83%2.41%
VICI Properties Inc2.19%2.68%
Extra Space Storage Inc2.18%2.12%
Public Storage3.41%2.08%
Kimco Realty Corp1.15%2.46%
Healthpeak Properties Inc0.94%3.24%
UDR Inc0.79%1.96%
BXP Inc0.63%1.94%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHHOnly in SPHD
Welltower Inc 9.64%Verizon Communications Inc. 3.49%
Prologis Inc 8.97%Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%
Equinix Inc 4.89%Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03%
Simon Property Group Inc 4.48%Pfizer Inc. 2.99%
Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36%Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%
American Tower Corp 4.35%ONEOK, Inc. 2.66%
Ventas Inc 2.85%Amcor PLC 2.41%
Iron Mountain Inc 2.69%Conagra Brands, Inc. 2.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

SCHH and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHH
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabInvesco
What it isUS REITS&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+9.8%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.7 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.30%
Already in the S&P 50074.0%95.7%
Holdings11749

SCHH in plain words

SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHH or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHH returned +9.8% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so SCHH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHH or SPHD?
SCHH charges 0.07% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHH and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 74% of SCHH and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHH against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHH against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHH-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources