Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs VXUS: how they differ

ONEQ and VXUS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VXUS returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and VXUS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and VXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQVXUS
DESCARTES SYS GROUP INC0.02%0.01%
SSR MINING INC0.01%0.01%
FIRSTSERVICE CORP0.02%0.01%
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION0.01%0.01%
COLLIERS INTL GROUP INC0.01%0.01%
METHANEX CORP0.01%0.01%
ALMONTY INDS INC0.01%0.01%
AYA GOLD and SILVER INC0.01%0.01%
PERPETUA RESOURCES CORP0.01%0.01%
BRP INC0.01%0.01%
TORM PLC0.01%0.00%
SHOPIFY INC0.32%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in VXUS
NVIDIA CORP 11.24%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.97%
APPLE INC 10.04%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.67%
MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%ASML Holding NV 1.32%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%SK hynix Inc 1.14%
ALPHABET INC 4.85%Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.89%
BROADCOM INC 4.64%HSBC Holdings PLC 0.74%
ALPHABET INC 4.48%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.69%
TESLA INC 3.58%AstraZeneca PLC 0.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and VXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isNasdaq CompositeTotal International Stock
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+22.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts+4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%0.0%
Holdings10228775

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

VXUS in plain words

VXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8775 positions, with the top ten at 12.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or VXUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and VXUS returned +22.3%, so VXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or VXUS?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and VXUS charges 0.05%, so VXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and VXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 0% of VXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against VXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against VXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-VXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources