Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs VXUS: how they differ

ACWI and VXUS hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and VXUS returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and VXUS hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and VXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIVXUS
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA0.25%0.59%
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK0.18%0.43%
Allianz SE0.17%0.41%
Siemens Energy AG0.17%0.37%
UBS Group AG0.14%0.33%
Enbridge Inc.0.12%0.28%
Deutsche Telekom AG0.12%0.26%
BANK OF MONTREAL0.11%0.25%
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE0.11%0.25%
GSK PLC0.10%0.25%
Zurich Insurance Group AG0.10%0.24%
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED0.10%0.23%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in VXUS
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.97%
APPLE INC. 4.02%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.67%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%ASML Holding NV 1.32%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%SK hynix Inc 1.14%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.89%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%HSBC Holdings PLC 0.74%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.69%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%AstraZeneca PLC 0.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWI and VXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI ACWITotal International Stock
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+22.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%0.0%
Holdings23078775

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

VXUS in plain words

VXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8775 positions, with the top ten at 12.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or VXUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and VXUS returned +22.3%, so VXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or VXUS?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and VXUS charges 0.05%, so VXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and VXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 0% of VXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against VXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against VXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-VXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources