Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs VBK: how they differ

ONEQ and VBK hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and VBK hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQVBK
ASTERA LABS INC0.12%1.05%
FIRST SOLAR INC0.07%0.34%
AST SPACEMOBILE INC0.07%0.35%
NATERA INC0.07%1.04%
REVOLUTION MEDICINES INC0.07%1.07%
CASEY'S GENERAL STORES INC0.06%0.83%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC0.06%0.69%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC0.06%0.74%
ILLUMINA INC0.05%0.36%
NEXTPOWER INC0.05%0.48%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORP DEL0.05%0.32%
SOFI TECHNOLOGIES INC0.05%0.65%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in VBK
NVIDIA CORP 11.24%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%
APPLE INC 10.04%Twilio Inc 0.88%
MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%Curtiss-Wright Corp 0.79%
ALPHABET INC 4.85%FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.78%
BROADCOM INC 4.64%nVent Electric PLC 0.77%
ALPHABET INC 4.48%ATI Inc 0.76%
TESLA INC 3.58%TechnipFMC PLC 0.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isNasdaq CompositeSmall-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%10.2%
Holdings1022545

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and VBK returned +13.8%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or VBK?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources