Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs SPMO: how they differ

ONEQ and SPMO hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and SPMO hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQSPMO
NVIDIA CORP11.24%8.46%
ALPHABET INC4.85%4.81%
BROADCOM INC4.64%7.58%
ALPHABET INC4.48%3.81%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC2.38%10.72%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC1.84%4.14%
INTEL CORP1.25%2.95%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.04%2.02%
LAM RESEARCH CORP0.87%3.54%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC0.78%1.39%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC0.78%1.77%
KLA CORP0.55%1.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in SPMO
APPLE INC 10.04%Johnson & Johnson 3.85%
MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%Caterpillar Inc. 2.60%
TESLA INC 3.58%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.03%General Electric Co. 1.63%
WALMART INC 2.02%Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) 1.43%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.93%RTX Corp. 1.40%
NETFLIX INC 0.79%GE Vernova Inc. 1.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityInvesco
What it isNasdaq CompositeS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%100.0%
Holdings102299

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or SPMO?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 34% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources