Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs SPHD: how they differ

ONEQ and SPHD hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and SPHD hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and SPHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQSPHD
COMCAST CORP0.19%1.60%
EXELON CORP0.10%1.59%
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP0.10%1.33%
PAYCHEX INC0.07%1.46%
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC/OH0.07%1.33%
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP0.07%2.09%
KRAFT HEINZ CO0.07%3.03%
PRICE (T ROWE) GROUP INC0.05%2.10%
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC0.05%1.70%
EVERGY INC0.04%1.70%
THE CAMPBELL'S COMPANY0.01%1.93%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in SPHD
NVIDIA CORP 11.24%Verizon Communications Inc. 3.49%
APPLE INC 10.04%Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%
MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%Pfizer Inc. 2.99%
ALPHABET INC 4.85%Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%
BROADCOM INC 4.64%VICI Properties Inc. 2.68%
ALPHABET INC 4.48%ONEOK, Inc. 2.66%
TESLA INC 3.58%Kimco Realty Corp. 2.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityInvesco
What it isNasdaq CompositeS&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.30%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%95.7%
Holdings102249

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or SPHD?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources