Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs SDY: how they differ

ONEQ and SDY hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and SDY hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQSDY
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.0.60%1.56%
QUALCOMM INC0.58%1.57%
ANALOG DEVICES INC0.44%0.61%
PEPSICO INC0.43%1.33%
MICROSOFT CORP7.32%0.36%
WALMART INC2.02%0.29%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.93%0.20%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC0.19%1.54%
CSX CORP0.18%0.62%
CINTAS CORP0.15%0.43%
FASTENAL CO0.11%0.91%
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC0.11%1.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in SDY
NVIDIA CORP 11.24%Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%
APPLE INC 10.04%Realty Income Corp 2.14%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%Kenvue Inc 1.76%
ALPHABET INC 4.85%AbbVie Inc 1.63%
BROADCOM INC 4.64%Target Corp 1.55%
ALPHABET INC 4.48%Edison International 1.45%
TESLA INC 3.58%Sysco Corp 1.41%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.03%WEC Energy Group Inc 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityState Street
What it isNasdaq CompositeSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%84.6%
Holdings1022155

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and SDY returned +11.0%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or SDY?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources