Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ONEQ vs SCHH: how they differ

ONEQ and SCHH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and SCHH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ONEQ and SCHH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingONEQSCHH
EQUINIX INC0.23%4.89%
SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORP0.04%1.54%
HOST HOTELS and RESORTS INC0.03%1.04%
REGENCY CENTERS CORP(REIT)0.03%0.90%
LAMAR ADVERTISING CO0.03%0.94%
GAMING AND LEISURE PROPERTIES INC0.03%0.94%
LINEAGE INC0.03%0.18%
PHILLIPS EDISON and CO INC0.01%0.36%
SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INC0.01%0.36%
DIAMONDROCK HOSPITALITY CO0.01%0.16%
DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TR0.01%0.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ONEQOnly in SCHH
NVIDIA CORP 11.24%Welltower Inc 9.64%
APPLE INC 10.04%Prologis Inc 8.97%
MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%Simon Property Group Inc 4.48%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36%
ALPHABET INC 4.85%American Tower Corp 4.35%
BROADCOM INC 4.64%Realty Income Corp 4.00%
ALPHABET INC 4.48%Public Storage 3.41%
TESLA INC 3.58%Ventas Inc 2.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

ONEQ and SCHH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
SCHH
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelitySchwab
What it isNasdaq CompositeUS REIT
Total return, 1 year+20.6%+9.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.1 pts−7.7 pts
Expense ratio0.21%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50087.4%74.0%
Holdings1022117

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

SCHH in plain words

SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or SCHH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and SCHH returned +9.8%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ONEQ or SCHH?
ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and SCHH charges 0.07%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ONEQ and SCHH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 74% of SCHH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ONEQ against SCHH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against SCHH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ONEQ-SCHH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources