Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MINT vs ONEQ: how they differ
MINT and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MINT and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MINT | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury 6.51% | NVIDIA CORP 11.24% |
| Fannie Mae 1.18% | APPLE INC 10.04% |
| Freddie Mac 1.04% | MICROSOFT CORP 7.32% |
| SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91% | AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81% | BROADCOM INC 4.64% |
| Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75% | ALPHABET INC 4.48% |
| INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73% | TESLA INC 3.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | PIMCO | Fidelity |
| What it is | Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.4% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.1 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 9.7% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 977 | 1022 |
MINT in plain words
MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.4% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or ONEQ?
- MINT charges 0.36% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MINT and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 10% of MINT and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MINT against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MINT-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources