Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWX vs MINT: how they differ
ACWX and MINT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ACWX | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| STANDARD CHARTERED PLC | 0.14% | 0.00% |
| Only in ACWX | Only in MINT |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.69% | United States Treasury 6.51% |
| ASML Holding N.V. 1.54% | Fannie Mae 1.18% |
| SK hynix Inc. 1.33% | Freddie Mac 1.04% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 1.07% | SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.86% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.81% | AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.79% | Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75% |
| Novartis AG 0.77% | INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | PIMCO |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI ex U.S. | Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.0% | +4.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.5 pts | −13.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.36% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 9.7% |
| Holdings | 1759 | 977 |
ACWX in plain words
ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1759 positions, with the top ten at 14.6%.
MINT in plain words
MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or MINT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and MINT returned +4.4%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or MINT?
- ACWX charges 0.32% a year and MINT charges 0.36%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ACWX and MINT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 10% of MINT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against MINT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWX-MINT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources