Which is cheaper, LYTE or XLF?

LYTE charges 0.65% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are LYTE and XLF the same kind of fund?

No. LYTE is a thematic ETF and XLF is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

LYTE vs XLF: how they differ

LYTE and XLF are measured over different days, and XLF charges 0.08% against 0.65%.

Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

LYTE and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF	XLF State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Thematic ETF	Core index fund
Issuer	Roundhill	State Street
What it is	Photonics and optics	Financials
Total return, 1 year	−0.4%	+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	−0.6%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+0.1 pts	−9.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.08%
Holdings	not filed	76

LYTE in plain words

LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it launched on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested against −0.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 11.4% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, LYTE or XLF?: LYTE charges 0.65% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are LYTE and XLF the same kind of fund?: No. LYTE is a thematic ETF and XLF is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LYTE against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LYTE against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/LYTE-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources