Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AGG vs LYTE: how they differ
AGG and LYTE are measured over different days, and AGG charges 0.03% against 0.65%.
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Thematic ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | Photonics and optics |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.7% | −0.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | −0.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.2 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% |
AGG in plain words
AGG is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
LYTE in plain words
LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it launched on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested against −0.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 11.4% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, AGG or LYTE?
- AGG charges 0.03% a year and LYTE charges 0.65%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are AGG and LYTE the same kind of fund?
- No. AGG is an index ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against LYTE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AGG-LYTE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources