Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
LYTE vs SPY: how they differ
LYTE and SPY are measured over different days, and SPY charges 0.09% against 0.65%.
Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.
| LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF | SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Thematic ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | State Street |
| What it is | Photonics and optics | S&P 500, book from IVV |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.4% | +17.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | −0.6% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | 0.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.09% |
| Holdings | not filed | 504 |
LYTE in plain words
LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it launched on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested against −0.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 11.4% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.
SPY in plain words
SPY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, LYTE or SPY?
- LYTE charges 0.65% a year and SPY charges 0.09%, so SPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are LYTE and SPY the same kind of fund?
- No. LYTE is a thematic ETF and SPY is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, LYTE against SPY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/LYTE-SPY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources