Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
KRE vs VYM: how they differ
KRE and VYM hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KRE and VYM hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KRE | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Truist Financial Corp | 1.27% | 0.27% |
| Huntington Bancshares Inc/OH | 1.33% | 0.14% |
| M&T Bank Corp | 1.35% | 0.14% |
| Citizens Financial Group Inc | 1.37% | 0.12% |
| Regions Financial Corp | 1.34% | 0.10% |
| East West Bancorp Inc | 1.28% | 0.07% |
| Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc | 1.37% | 0.06% |
| First Horizon Corp | 1.31% | 0.05% |
| Webster Financial Corp | 1.35% | 0.05% |
| Wintrust Financial Corp | 1.32% | 0.04% |
| Popular Inc | 1.33% | 0.04% |
| SOUTHSTATE BANK CORP | 1.31% | 0.04% |
| Only in KRE | Only in VYM |
|---|---|
| Ameris Bancorp 1.32% | Broadcom Inc 8.07% |
| Banc of California Inc 1.32% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36% |
| Flagstar Bank NA 1.31% | Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73% |
| Texas Capital Bancshares Inc 1.30% | Johnson & Johnson 2.31% |
| Axos Financial Inc 1.18% | Caterpillar Inc 1.73% |
| Bancorp Inc/The 0.97% | AbbVie Inc 1.57% |
| WSFS Financial Corp 0.94% | Cisco Systems Inc 1.52% |
| Nicolet Bankshares Inc 0.93% | Chevron Corp 1.51% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| KRE State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF | VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | Vanguard |
| What it is | SPDR S&P Regional Banking | US high dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.1% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −1.4 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 6.7% | 92.2% |
| Holdings | 161 | 608 |
KRE in plain words
KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VYM in plain words
VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, KRE or VYM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KRE returned +16.1% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, KRE or VYM?
- KRE charges 0.35% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do KRE and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 7% of KRE and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KRE against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/KRE-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources