Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

KRE vs VBK: how they differ

KRE and VBK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and KRE returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KRE and VBK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions KRE and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingKREVBK
Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc1.37%0.20%
ServisFirst Bancshares Inc0.76%0.06%
TFS Financial Corp0.43%0.03%
Triumph Financial Inc0.57%0.02%
Live Oak Bancshares Inc0.30%0.02%
Columbia Financial Inc0.19%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in KREOnly in VBK
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 1.37%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%
UMB Financial Corp 1.37%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%
Citizens Financial Group Inc 1.37%Astera Labs Inc 1.05%
Glacier Bancorp Inc 1.36%Natera Inc 1.04%
Associated Banc-Corp 1.36%Twilio Inc 0.88%
Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc 1.35%Casey's General Stores Inc 0.83%
First Interstate BancSystem Inc 1.35%Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82%
Fulton Financial Corp 1.35%Curtiss-Wright Corp 0.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

KRE and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KRE
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR S&P Regional BankingSmall-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+16.1%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.4 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.05%
Already in the S&P 5006.7%10.2%
Holdings161545

KRE in plain words

KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, KRE or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KRE returned +16.1% and VBK returned +13.8%, so KRE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, KRE or VBK?
KRE charges 0.35% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do KRE and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of KRE and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KRE against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KRE against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/KRE-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources