Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

KRE vs SPHD: how they differ

KRE and SPHD hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and KRE returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KRE and SPHD hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions KRE and SPHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingKRESPHD
Regions Financial Corp1.34%1.59%
Huntington Bancshares Inc/OH1.33%1.33%
Truist Financial Corp1.27%1.75%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in KREOnly in SPHD
Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc 1.37%Verizon Communications Inc. 3.49%
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 1.37%Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%
UMB Financial Corp 1.37%Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24%
Citizens Financial Group Inc 1.37%Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03%
Glacier Bancorp Inc 1.36%Pfizer Inc. 2.99%
Associated Banc-Corp 1.36%Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%
Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc 1.35%VICI Properties Inc. 2.68%
First Interstate BancSystem Inc 1.35%ONEOK, Inc. 2.66%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

KRE and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KRE
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetInvesco
What it isSPDR S&P Regional BankingS&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+16.1%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.4 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.30%
Already in the S&P 5006.7%95.7%
Holdings16149

KRE in plain words

KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, KRE or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KRE returned +16.1% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so KRE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, KRE or SPHD?
KRE charges 0.35% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so SPHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do KRE and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of KRE and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KRE against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KRE against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/KRE-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources