Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
KRE vs ONEQ: how they differ
KRE and ONEQ hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KRE and ONEQ hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KRE | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Huntington Bancshares Inc/OH | 1.33% | 0.07% |
| East West Bancorp Inc | 1.28% | 0.03% |
| Old National Bancorp/IN | 1.35% | 0.02% |
| Wintrust Financial Corp | 1.32% | 0.02% |
| Popular Inc | 1.33% | 0.02% |
| UMB Financial Corp | 1.37% | 0.02% |
| BOK Financial Corp | 1.34% | 0.02% |
| Columbia Banking System Inc | 1.34% | 0.02% |
| Zions Bancorp NA | 1.33% | 0.02% |
| Central BanCo Inc | 0.54% | 0.02% |
| Commerce Bancshares Inc/MO | 1.34% | 0.02% |
| United Bankshares Inc/WV | 1.29% | 0.02% |
| Only in KRE | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc 1.37% | NVIDIA CORP 11.24% |
| Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 1.37% | APPLE INC 10.04% |
| Citizens Financial Group Inc 1.37% | MICROSOFT CORP 7.32% |
| Glacier Bancorp Inc 1.36% | AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% |
| Associated Banc-Corp 1.36% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc 1.35% | BROADCOM INC 4.64% |
| Webster Financial Corp 1.35% | ALPHABET INC 4.48% |
| M&T Bank Corp 1.35% | TESLA INC 3.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| KRE State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | Fidelity |
| What it is | SPDR S&P Regional Banking | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.1% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −1.4 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 6.7% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 161 | 1022 |
KRE in plain words
KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, KRE or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KRE returned +16.1% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, KRE or ONEQ?
- KRE charges 0.35% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do KRE and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 7% of KRE and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KRE against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/KRE-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources