Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYW vs VIG: how they differ

IYW and VIG hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and VIG hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYW and VIG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYWVIG
APPLE INC.13.65%4.10%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION3.99%3.99%
BROADCOM INC.3.78%5.21%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION1.99%1.46%
ORACLE CORPORATION1.67%1.24%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED1.57%1.16%
KLA CORPORATION1.41%1.04%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT1.32%0.98%
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.1.21%0.89%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED1.18%0.87%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION1.10%0.82%
INTUIT INC.0.65%0.49%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYWOnly in VIG
NVIDIA CORPORATION 16.25%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.61%
ALPHABET INC. 7.84%Eli Lilly & Co 3.36%
ALPHABET INC. 6.34%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.92%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.50%Walmart Inc 2.62%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%Johnson & Johnson 2.51%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.81%Visa Inc 2.34%
INTEL CORPORATION 2.56%Costco Wholesale Corp 2.04%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 1.92%Caterpillar Inc 1.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

IYW and VIG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. TechnologyDividend growth
Total return, 1 year+34.9%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.4 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50095.5%95.7%
Holdings139332

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or VIG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and VIG returned +12.4%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYW or VIG?
IYW charges 0.37% a year and VIG charges 0.04%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and VIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 96% of VIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYW against VIG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against VIG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYW-VIG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources