Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs IYW: how they differ

ACWI and IYW hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and IYW hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIIYW
NVIDIA CORPORATION4.89%16.25%
APPLE INC.4.02%13.65%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION2.90%3.99%
ALPHABET INC.2.26%7.84%
BROADCOM INC.1.90%3.78%
ALPHABET INC.1.87%6.34%
META PLATFORMS, INC.1.34%2.81%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.0.59%2.98%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.0.58%3.50%
INTEL CORPORATION0.43%2.56%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION0.33%1.99%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.0.32%1.86%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in IYW
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%SANDISK CORPORATION 0.96%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC 0.12%
TESLA, INC. 1.09%TD SYNNEX CORPORATION 0.11%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 0.86%LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 0.10%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 0.76%AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 0.09%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 0.66%ONTO INNOVATION INC. 0.09%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.66%GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE, INC. 0.07%
WALMART INC. 0.58%CACI INTERNATIONAL INC. 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWI and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI ACWIU.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%95.5%
Holdings2307139

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or IYW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or IYW?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against IYW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-IYW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources