Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs VIG: how they differ

ACWI and VIG hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and VIG hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and VIG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIVIG
APPLE INC.4.02%4.10%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION2.90%3.99%
BROADCOM INC.1.90%5.21%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.0.86%3.61%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY0.76%3.36%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION0.66%2.92%
WALMART INC.0.58%2.62%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON0.56%2.51%
VISA INC.0.56%2.34%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION0.45%2.04%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED0.43%1.86%
CATERPILLAR INC.0.42%1.88%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in VIG
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Albemarle Corp 0.10%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%BWX Technologies Inc 0.09%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%Royal Gold Inc 0.09%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%ITT Inc 0.08%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%DT Midstream Inc 0.07%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.34%Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc 0.07%
TESLA, INC. 1.09%Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc 0.07%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 0.66%Reinsurance Group of America Inc 0.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWI and VIG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI ACWIDividend growth
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%95.7%
Holdings2307332

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or VIG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and VIG returned +12.4%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or VIG?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and VIG charges 0.04%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and VIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 96% of VIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against VIG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against VIG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-VIG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources