Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYW vs SPHQ: how they differ

IYW and SPHQ hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and SPHQ hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYW and SPHQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYWSPHQ
APPLE INC.13.65%4.51%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION1.99%4.10%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.1.92%2.80%
KLA CORPORATION1.41%3.27%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED1.18%2.03%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION0.91%2.15%
APPLOVIN CORPORATION0.65%1.56%
ADOBE INC.0.62%1.45%
FORTINET, INC.0.32%0.85%
NETAPP, INC.0.13%0.32%
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.0.12%0.18%
F5, INC.0.11%0.16%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYWOnly in SPHQ
NVIDIA CORPORATION 16.25%Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%
ALPHABET INC. 7.84%Visa Inc. 4.69%
ALPHABET INC. 6.34%Mastercard Inc. 4.32%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.99%General Electric Co. 4.16%
BROADCOM INC. 3.78%Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.50%Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%Procter & Gamble Co. (The) 3.46%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.81%Coca-Cola Co. (The) 3.34%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

IYW and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isU.S. TechnologyS&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year+34.9%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.4 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50095.5%99.9%
Holdings13999

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or SPHQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYW or SPHQ?
IYW charges 0.37% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYW against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYW-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources