Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IXUS vs VWO: how they differ
IXUS and VWO hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF and Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IXUS and VWO hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IXUS | VWO |
|---|---|---|
| America Movil, S.A.B. de C.V. | 0.06% | 0.18% |
| Global Unichip Corp | 0.03% | 0.10% |
| Piraeus Bank SA | 0.03% | 0.09% |
| State Bank of India | 0.05% | 0.03% |
| Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank PJSC | 0.02% | 0.08% |
| Zhongji Innolight Co Ltd | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Divi's Laboratories Ltd | 0.02% | 0.08% |
| Banco de Chile | 0.02% | 0.07% |
| SASOL LIMITED | 0.02% | 0.08% |
| eMemory Technology Inc | 0.02% | 0.07% |
| Vibra Energia S.A. | 0.02% | 0.07% |
| YUM CHINA HOLDINGS, INC. | 0.04% | 0.02% |
| Only in IXUS | Only in VWO |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.04% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 14.73% |
| ASML Holding N.V. 1.32% | Tencent Holdings Ltd 3.28% |
| SK hynix Inc. 1.15% | Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 2.57% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 0.91% | Delta Electronics Inc 1.18% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.75% | MediaTek Inc 1.07% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.69% | Reliance Industries Ltd 0.90% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.67% | HDFC Bank Ltd 0.81% |
| Novartis AG 0.66% | Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd 0.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | VWO Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Core MSCI Total International Stock | Emerging markets |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.2% | +15.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | −1.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.06% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 4185 | 6355 |
IXUS in plain words
IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4185 positions, with the top ten at 12.6%.
VWO in plain words
VWO is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 6355 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IXUS or VWO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXUS returned +22.2% and VWO returned +15.6%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IXUS or VWO?
- IXUS charges 0.07% a year and VWO charges 0.06%, so VWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IXUS and VWO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IXUS and 0% of VWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IXUS against VWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IXUS-VWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources