Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs IXUS: how they differ

ACWI and IXUS hold 36% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and IXUS hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and IXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIIXUS
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa1.73%4.04%
ASML Holding N.V.0.56%1.32%
SK hynix Inc.0.49%1.15%
Tencent Holdings Limited0.39%0.91%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC0.32%0.75%
ASTRAZENECA PLC0.29%0.69%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited0.29%0.67%
Novartis AG0.28%0.66%
SHELL PLC0.27%0.61%
Nestle S.A.0.26%0.61%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA0.25%0.59%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft0.23%0.53%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in IXUS
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. 0.04%
APPLE INC. 4.02%Mitsui Kinzoku Company, Limited 0.04%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%Resonac Holdings Corporation 0.04%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%MPI CORPORATION 0.04%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%PLS GROUP LIMITED 0.04%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY LTD 0.03%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%DIPLOMA PLC 0.03%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.34%Accelleron Industries AG 0.03%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWI and IXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI ACWICore MSCI Total International Stock
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+22.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+4.7 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%0.0%
Holdings23074185

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4185 positions, with the top ten at 12.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or IXUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or IXUS?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 36% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against IXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against IXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-IXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources