Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IXUS vs VEU: how they differ
IXUS and VEU hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and VEU returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IXUS and VEU hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IXUS | VEU |
|---|---|---|
| ROYAL BANK OF CANADA | 0.59% | 0.65% |
| THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK | 0.43% | 0.47% |
| Allianz SE | 0.41% | 0.45% |
| Siemens Energy AG | 0.39% | 0.41% |
| SHOPIFY INC. | 0.35% | 0.38% |
| UBS Group AG | 0.33% | 0.36% |
| Deutsche Telekom AG | 0.28% | 0.28% |
| BANK OF MONTREAL | 0.25% | 0.28% |
| GSK PLC | 0.25% | 0.27% |
| CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE | 0.24% | 0.27% |
| Zurich Insurance Group AG | 0.24% | 0.27% |
| CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED | 0.23% | 0.25% |
| Only in IXUS | Only in VEU |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.04% | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.83% |
| ASML Holding N.V. 1.32% | ASML Holding NV 1.45% |
| SK hynix Inc. 1.15% | SK hynix Inc 1.24% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 0.91% | Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.97% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.75% | HSBC Holdings PLC 0.81% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.69% | Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.76% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.67% | AstraZeneca PLC 0.73% |
| Novartis AG 0.66% | Novartis AG 0.73% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | VEU Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Core MSCI Total International Stock | FTSE All-World ex-US |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.2% | +22.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | +5.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 4185 | 3860 |
IXUS in plain words
IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4185 positions, with the top ten at 12.6%.
VEU in plain words
VEU is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex-US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3860 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IXUS or VEU?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXUS returned +22.2% and VEU returned +22.9%, so VEU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IXUS or VEU?
- IXUS charges 0.07% a year and VEU charges 0.04%, so VEU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IXUS and VEU overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IXUS and 0% of VEU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IXUS against VEU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IXUS-VEU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources