Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWO vs SCHH: how they differ
IWO and SCHH hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IWO returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWO and SCHH hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWO | SCHH |
|---|---|---|
| Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | 0.48% | 0.52% |
| Outfront Media, Inc. | 0.32% | 0.33% |
| Tanger, Inc. | 0.22% | 0.29% |
| DiamondRock Hospitality Co. | 0.10% | 0.16% |
| Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.05% |
| Alexander's, Inc. | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. | 0.03% | 0.14% |
| Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 0.02% | 0.12% |
| Gladstone Commercial Corp. | 0.01% | 0.04% |
| UMH Properties, Inc. | 0.01% | 0.09% |
| Only in IWO | Only in SCHH |
|---|---|
| Moog, Inc. 0.73% | Welltower Inc 9.64% |
| BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.68% | Prologis Inc 8.97% |
| MaxLinear, Inc. 0.67% | Equinix Inc 4.89% |
| Argan, Inc. 0.66% | Simon Property Group Inc 4.48% |
| JFrog Ltd. 0.60% | Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36% |
| Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.58% | American Tower Corp 4.35% |
| ESCO Technologies, Inc. 0.56% | Realty Income Corp 4.00% |
| FirstCash Holdings, Inc. 0.54% | Public Storage 3.41% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | SCHH Schwab U.S. REIT ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | Russell 2000 Growth | US REIT |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +9.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.5 pts | −7.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.24% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 74.0% |
| Holdings | 1133 | 117 |
IWO in plain words
IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1133 positions, with the top ten at 6.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHH in plain words
SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWO or SCHH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +17.0% and SCHH returned +9.8%, so IWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWO or SCHH?
- IWO charges 0.24% a year and SCHH charges 0.07%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWO and SCHH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 74% of SCHH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWO against SCHH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWO-SCHH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources