Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWO vs ONEQ: how they differ
IWO and ONEQ hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWO and ONEQ hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWO | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Hut 8 Corp. | 0.38% | 0.03% |
| BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. | 0.68% | 0.03% |
| FirstCash Holdings, Inc. | 0.54% | 0.02% |
| Old National Bancorp | 0.06% | 0.02% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. | 0.39% | 0.02% |
| Cytokinetics, Inc. | 0.07% | 0.02% |
| Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. | 0.51% | 0.02% |
| StoneX Group, Inc. | 0.52% | 0.02% |
| UMB Financial Corp. | 0.05% | 0.02% |
| Cipher Digital, Inc. | 0.50% | 0.02% |
| MYR Group, Inc. | 0.47% | 0.02% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. | 0.40% | 0.02% |
| Only in IWO | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| Moog, Inc. 0.73% | NVIDIA CORP 11.24% |
| Argan, Inc. 0.66% | APPLE INC 10.04% |
| JFrog Ltd. 0.60% | MICROSOFT CORP 7.32% |
| ESCO Technologies, Inc. 0.56% | AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% |
| D-Wave Quantum, Inc. 0.53% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| EnerSys 0.49% | BROADCOM INC 4.64% |
| Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. 0.48% | ALPHABET INC 4.48% |
| Glaukos Corp. 0.48% | TESLA INC 3.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Russell 2000 Growth | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.5 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.24% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 1133 | 1022 |
IWO in plain words
IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1133 positions, with the top ten at 6.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWO or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +17.0% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWO or ONEQ?
- IWO charges 0.24% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWO and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWO against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWO-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources