Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs VBK: how they differ

IWB and VBK hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VBK hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWB and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWBVBK
Astera Labs, Inc0.11%1.05%
FLEX LTD.0.09%0.42%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.07%1.27%
EMCOR GROUP, INC.0.05%0.52%
NATERA, INC.0.05%1.04%
REVOLUTION MEDICINES, INC.0.05%1.07%
EQT CORPORATION0.05%0.23%
TWILIO INC.0.04%0.88%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION0.04%0.82%
CASEY'S GENERAL STORES, INC.0.04%0.83%
MKS, INCORPORATED.0.04%0.42%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION0.04%0.79%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWBOnly in VBK
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.73%Hut 8 Corp 0.33%
APPLE INC. 6.03%Cytokinetics Inc 0.33%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.00%BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.32%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.33%MaxLinear Inc 0.31%
ALPHABET INC. 3.00%Argan Inc 0.30%
BROADCOM INC. 2.54%Krystal Biotech Inc 0.29%
ALPHABET INC. 2.42%CareTrust REIT Inc 0.27%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.88%Cipher Digital Inc 0.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IWB and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isRussell 1000Small-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.8 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50091.9%10.2%
Holdings1024545

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and VBK returned +13.8%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or VBK?
IWB charges 0.15% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources