Which returned more over the last year, AGG or IWB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −0.7% and IWB returned +16.7%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, AGG or IWB?

AGG charges 0.03% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AGG vs IWB: how they differ

AGG is a bond index fund and IWB an equity index fund, and over the year IWB returned more, +16.7% against −0.7%.

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.

AGG and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	US aggregate bonds	Russell 1000
Total return, 1 year	−0.7%	+16.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.2 pts	−0.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.15%
Holdings	not filed	1024

AGG in plain words

AGG is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or IWB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −0.7% and IWB returned +16.7%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AGG or IWB?: AGG charges 0.03% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AGG against IWB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against IWB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AGG-IWB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources