Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs SPY: how they differ

IWB and SPY hold 90% of their weight in the same names, and SPY returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and SPY hold 90% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWB and SPY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWBSPY
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.73%7.52%
APPLE INC.6.03%6.59%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.00%4.30%
AMAZON.COM, INC.3.33%3.62%
ALPHABET INC.3.00%3.25%
BROADCOM INC.2.54%2.77%
ALPHABET INC.2.42%2.59%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.1.88%2.02%
META PLATFORMS, INC.1.79%1.92%
TESLA, INC.1.77%1.84%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY1.38%1.47%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.1.36%1.47%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWBOnly in SPY
LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.34%Linde plc 0.37%
EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.24%Seagate Technology Holdings plc 0.34%
Chubb Limited 0.17%Eaton Corp. plc 0.26%
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPAN 0.16%Chubb Ltd. 0.19%
MEDTRONIC PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.14%Trane Technologies plc 0.17%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 0.13%Medtronic plc 0.16%
JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LI 0.13%Johnson Controls International plc 0.14%
SNOWFLAKE INC. 0.12%Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 0.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IWB and SPY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isRussell 1000S&P 500, book from IVV
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+17.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.8 pts0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50091.9%100.0%
Holdings1024504

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

SPY in plain words

SPY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SPY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and SPY returned +17.5%, so SPY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or SPY?
IWB charges 0.15% a year and SPY charges 0.09%, so SPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and SPY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 100% of SPY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 90% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against SPY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against SPY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-SPY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources