Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ITOT vs XLF: how they differ

ITOT and XLF hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and ITOT returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and XLF hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ITOT and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingITOTXLF
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.1.26%12.10%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.20%11.57%
Visa, Inc.0.78%7.51%
Mastercard, Inc.0.57%5.47%
Bank of America Corp.0.51%4.91%
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)0.41%3.94%
Wells Fargo & Co.0.35%3.34%
Morgan Stanley0.34%3.31%
Citigroup, Inc.0.33%3.15%
American Express Co.0.25%2.38%
Charles Schwab Corp. (The)0.21%1.99%
BlackRock, Inc.0.19%1.83%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITOTOnly in XLF
NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%Chubb Ltd 1.62%
Apple, Inc. 5.82%Aon PLC 0.94%
Microsoft Corp. 3.80%Arch Capital Group Ltd 0.45%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%Willis Towers Watson PLC 0.33%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%Everest Group Ltd 0.19%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%Invesco Ltd 0.15%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

ITOT and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore S&P Total U.S. Stock MarketFinancials
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%100.0%
Holdings249776

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and XLF returned +7.6%, so ITOT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or XLF?
ITOT charges 0.03% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITOT against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ITOT-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources