Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ITOT vs VIG: how they differ

ITOT and VIG hold 36% of their weight in the same names, and ITOT returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and VIG hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ITOT and VIG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingITOTVIG
Apple, Inc.5.82%4.10%
Microsoft Corp.3.80%3.99%
Broadcom, Inc.2.45%5.21%
Eli Lilly & Co.1.30%3.36%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.20%3.61%
Johnson & Johnson0.84%2.51%
Visa, Inc.0.78%2.34%
Exxon Mobil Corp.0.78%2.92%
Lam Research Corp.0.74%1.46%
Walmart, Inc.0.68%2.62%
Caterpillar, Inc.0.67%1.88%
Cisco Systems, Inc.0.64%1.64%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITOTOnly in VIG
NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%Linde PLC 1.06%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%Eaton Corp PLC 0.76%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%Honeywell International Inc 0.62%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%Chubb Ltd 0.54%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%Accenture PLC 0.50%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 1.70%Medtronic PLC 0.47%
Tesla, Inc. 1.62%Aon PLC 0.30%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.30%TE Connectivity PLC 0.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ITOT and VIG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore S&P Total U.S. Stock MarketDividend growth
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%95.7%
Holdings2497332

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or VIG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and VIG returned +12.4%, so ITOT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or VIG?
ITOT charges 0.03% a year and VIG charges 0.04%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and VIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 96% of VIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 36% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITOT against VIG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against VIG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ITOT-VIG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources