Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ITOT vs VHT: how they differ

ITOT and VHT hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and VHT hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ITOT and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingITOTVHT
Eli Lilly & Co.1.30%14.07%
Johnson & Johnson0.84%8.48%
AbbVie, Inc.0.61%6.10%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.0.52%5.46%
Merck & Co., Inc.0.43%4.67%
Amgen, Inc.0.27%2.87%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.0.26%2.93%
Abbott Laboratories0.22%2.36%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.0.21%2.64%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.0.19%2.39%
Pfizer, Inc.0.19%2.36%
CVS Health Corp.0.18%1.83%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITOTOnly in VHT
NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%Medtronic PLC 1.50%
Apple, Inc. 5.82%STERIS PLC 0.33%
Microsoft Corp. 3.80%Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLC 0.20%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%Roivant Sciences Ltd 0.18%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%Masimo Corp 0.13%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%Alkermes PLC 0.10%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%LivaNova PLC 0.06%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%Novocure Ltd 0.03%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ITOT and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore S&P Total U.S. Stock MarketHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%85.6%
Holdings2497401

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or VHT?
ITOT charges 0.03% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITOT against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ITOT-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources