Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ITOT vs SPHQ: how they differ

ITOT and SPHQ hold 17% of their weight in the same names.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and SPHQ hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ITOT and SPHQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingITOTSPHQ
Apple, Inc.5.82%4.51%
Applied Materials, Inc.0.79%2.80%
Visa, Inc.0.78%4.69%
Lam Research Corp.0.74%4.10%
Caterpillar, Inc.0.67%3.78%
Cisco Systems, Inc.0.64%3.54%
Costco Wholesale Corp.0.57%4.82%
Mastercard, Inc.0.57%4.32%
KLA Corp.0.54%3.27%
GE Aerospace0.53%4.16%
Procter & Gamble Co. (The)0.47%3.46%
Merck & Co., Inc.0.43%2.87%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITOTOnly in SPHQ
NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%Eaton Corp. PLC 1.65%
Microsoft Corp. 3.80%Trane Technologies PLC 1.30%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%Johnson Controls International PLC 1.05%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%Accenture PLC 1.04%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%Arch Capital Group Ltd. 0.34%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%Steris PLC 0.25%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 1.70%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ITOT and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isCore S&P Total U.S. Stock MarketS&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%99.9%
Holdings249799

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or SPHQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or SPHQ?
ITOT charges 0.03% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITOT against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ITOT-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources