Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ITOT vs SDY: how they differ

ITOT and SDY hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and ITOT returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and SDY hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ITOT and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingITOTSDY
Johnson & Johnson0.84%1.00%
Exxon Mobil Corp.0.78%0.93%
AbbVie, Inc.0.61%1.63%
Caterpillar, Inc.0.67%0.47%
Procter & Gamble Co. (The)0.47%1.26%
Coca-Cola Co. (The)0.43%1.26%
Chevron Corp.0.42%1.28%
Texas Instruments, Inc.0.37%1.56%
International Business Machines Corp.0.36%1.27%
Microsoft Corp.3.80%0.36%
Walmart, Inc.0.68%0.29%
QUALCOMM, Inc.0.27%1.57%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITOTOnly in SDY
NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%Medtronic PLC 1.30%
Apple, Inc. 5.82%Amcor PLC 0.93%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%Accenture PLC 0.88%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%Linde PLC 0.56%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%Chubb Ltd 0.51%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%STERIS PLC 0.46%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%Pentair PLC 0.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 1.70%RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd 0.23%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

ITOT and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore S&P Total U.S. Stock MarketSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%84.6%
Holdings2497155

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and SDY returned +11.0%, so ITOT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or SDY?
ITOT charges 0.03% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITOT against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ITOT-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources