Which returned more over the last year, ILF or XOP?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ILF or XOP?

ILF charges 0.47% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so XOP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ILF vs XOP: how they differ

ILF and XOP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XOP returned more over the year.

iShares Latin America 40 ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILF and XOP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ILF	Only in XOP
VALE S.A. 8.48%	Texas Pacific Land Corp 3.17%
Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.25%	PBF Energy Inc 2.91%
Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 7.11%	Delek US Holdings Inc 2.81%
Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. 5.68%	Expand Energy Corp 2.80%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 5.19%	CNX Resources Corp 2.78%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 4.83%	EQT Corp 2.75%
CREDICORP LTD. 4.26%	Valero Energy Corp 2.75%
Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. 4.11%	Antero Resources Corp 2.68%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

ILF and XOP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF	XOP State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	Latin America 40	SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Total return, 1 year	+33.4%	+52.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+15.9 pts	+34.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.47%	0.35%
Holdings	45	51

ILF in plain words

ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 55.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XOP in plain words

XOP is a commodity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 26.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILF or XOP?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ILF or XOP?: ILF charges 0.47% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so XOP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ILF against XOP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ILF against XOP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ILF-XOP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources