Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or XOP?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ACWX or XOP?

ACWX charges 0.32% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWX vs XOP: how they differ

ACWX and XOP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XOP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and XOP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWX	Only in XOP
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.69%	Texas Pacific Land Corp 3.17%
ASML Holding N.V. 1.54%	PBF Energy Inc 2.91%
SK hynix Inc. 1.33%	Delek US Holdings Inc 2.81%
Tencent Holdings Limited 1.07%	Expand Energy Corp 2.80%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.86%	CNX Resources Corp 2.78%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.81%	EQT Corp 2.75%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.79%	Valero Energy Corp 2.75%
Novartis AG 0.77%	Antero Resources Corp 2.68%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ACWX and XOP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	XOP State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	MSCI ACWI ex U.S.	SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Total return, 1 year	+23.0%	+52.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.5 pts	+34.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.35%
Holdings	1759	51

ACWX in plain words

ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1759 positions, with the top ten at 14.6%.

XOP in plain words

XOP is a commodity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 26.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or XOP?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or XOP?: ACWX charges 0.32% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWX against XOP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against XOP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWX-XOP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources