Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AOR vs ILF: how they differ
AOR and ILF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and iShares Latin America 40 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AOR | Only in ILF |
|---|---|
| iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07% | VALE S.A. 8.48% |
| iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09% | Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.25% |
| iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02% | Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 7.11% |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29% | Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. 5.68% |
| iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57% | Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 5.19% |
| iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99% | Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 4.83% |
| iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96% | CREDICORP LTD. 4.26% |
| Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. 4.11% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation | Latin America 40 |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | +33.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | +15.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.47% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 7 | 45 |
AOR in plain words
AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
ILF in plain words
ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 55.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or ILF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and ILF returned +33.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or ILF?
- AOR charges 0.15% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AOR and ILF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 0% of ILF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against ILF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-ILF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources