Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ILF vs MINT: how they differ

ILF and MINT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.

iShares Latin America 40 ETF and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILF and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ILFOnly in MINT
VALE S.A. 8.48%United States Treasury 6.51%
Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.25%Fannie Mae 1.18%
Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 7.11%Freddie Mac 1.04%
Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. 5.68%SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.91%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 5.19%HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.81%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 4.83%AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.81%
CREDICORP LTD. 4.26%Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.75%
Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. 4.11%INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

ILF and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ILF
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesPIMCO
What it isLatin America 40Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad
Total return, 1 year+33.4%+4.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+15.9 pts−13.1 pts
Expense ratio0.47%0.36%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%9.7%
Holdings45977

ILF in plain words

ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 55.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MINT in plain words

MINT is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Trad. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 977 positions, with the top ten at 14.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILF or MINT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and MINT returned +4.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ILF or MINT?
ILF charges 0.47% a year and MINT charges 0.36%, so MINT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ILF and MINT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ILF and 10% of MINT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ILF against MINT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ILF against MINT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ILF-MINT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources