Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
GLDM vs VPU: how they differ
GLDM is a commodity fund and VPU an equity index fund, and over the year GLDM returned more, +19.4% against +2.1%.
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust and Vanguard Utilities Index Fund.
| GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | VPU Vanguard Utilities Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Gold MiniShares | Utilities |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.4% | +2.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.9 pts | −15.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.09% |
| Holdings | not filed | 66 |
GLDM in plain words
GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VPU in plain words
VPU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 52.7%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or VPU?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +19.4% and VPU returned +2.1%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDM against VPU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GLDM-VPU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources