Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
GLDM vs SPMO: how they differ
GLDM is a commodity fund and SPMO an equity index fund, and over the year SPMO returned more, +24.5% against +19.4%.
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.
| GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | Gold MiniShares | S&P 500 Momentum |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.4% | +24.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.9 pts | +7.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.13% |
| Holdings | not filed | 99 |
GLDM in plain words
GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or SPMO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +19.4% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDM against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GLDM-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources