Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FTEC vs VIG: how they differ

FTEC and VIG hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and VIG hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FTEC and VIG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFTECVIG
Broadcom Inc5.01%5.21%
Apple Inc14.38%4.10%
Microsoft Corp9.54%3.99%
Cisco Systems Inc1.66%1.64%
Lam Research Corp1.49%1.46%
Oracle Corp1.22%1.24%
Texas Instruments Inc1.20%1.16%
KLA Corp1.09%1.04%
International Business Machines Corp0.99%0.98%
Analog Devices Inc0.95%0.89%
QUALCOMM Inc0.92%0.87%
Amphenol Corp0.86%0.82%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FTECOnly in VIG
NVIDIA Corp 18.00%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.61%
Micron Technology Inc 2.64%Eli Lilly & Co 3.36%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.92%
Intel Corp 1.99%Walmart Inc 2.62%
Applied Materials Inc 1.45%Johnson & Johnson 2.51%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.40%Visa Inc 2.34%
Arista Networks Inc 0.89%Costco Wholesale Corp 2.04%
Sandisk Corp/DE 0.80%Caterpillar Inc 1.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

FTEC and VIG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isMSCI Information TechnologyDividend growth
Total return, 1 year+35.7%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+18.2 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50086.2%95.7%
Holdings282332

FTEC in plain words

FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or VIG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and VIG returned +12.4%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or VIG?
FTEC charges 0.08% a year and VIG charges 0.04%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and VIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 96% of VIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FTEC against VIG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against VIG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-VIG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources